Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday officially revealed his controversial gerrymandering plan to grab five or six U.S. House of Representatives seats now held by California Republicans and deliver them to Democrats in a bid to counter a similar move by Republicans in Texas that President Donald Trump pushed.

Newsom touted his plan to create more Democrat-dominated districts shortly after about a dozen armed and masked U.S. Border Patrol agents in military-style fatigues appeared outside the Japanese American National Museum in Los Angeles where he was to speak, a move the governor called “pretty sick and pathetic.”

Maps detailing the redistricting would be released in the next few days, Newsom said. He said he believed he would have the two-thirds vote in both houses of the state legislature necessary to put the measure before voters in a Nov. 4 special election.

“These maps will completely neuter or neutralize what is happening in Texas,” Newsom said. Although similar bids to Texas’ gerrymandering are underway in other Republican dominated states, he said his initiative would only go ahead if Texas or another state carried out such plans.

“We’ve got to meet fire with fire,” Newsom said. “This is a break-the-glass moment for our democracy, for our nation.”

Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who led the creation of California’s independent redistricting commission, has expressed opposition to Newsom’s plan.

The “Election Rigging Response Act” would short-circuit official redistricting, which happens every 10 years, led by an independent commission since 2010. If approved by voters, it would temporarily replace the current commission-drawn district maps from the 2020 census with maps approved by lawmakers, but not prevent the commission from drawing new maps after the 2030 census. The commission realignment would have otherwise taken place in 2030.

Rocklin Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley, whose seat would be at risk from redistricting, last week introduced legislation for a nationwide prohibition on early redistricting. In a Thursday news conference, Kiley said Californians voted to create the independent commission “to take the power out of the hands of politicians,” and Newsom’s plan represented “an attack on the voters of California.”

California Republican Party chairwoman Corrin Rankin on Thursday slammed Newsom’s plan as “a calculated power grab that dismantles the very safeguards voters put in place.”

Before Newsom’s press conference, his office posted video on social media of Border Patrol agents outside the press conference venue. Newsom’s office suggested “Trump’s private army” had showed up at the event to intimidate. The clip showed the Border Patrol’s Los Angeles chief Gregory Bovino saying the agents were there “making Los Angeles a safer place.”

The White House responded to questions from this news organization by sending links to X posts by White House spokesman Steven Cheung, who described Newsom as a “coward” who gave an “incoherent” speech.

Republicans are expected to face headwinds in next year’s mid-term elections. Current district maps for the House in California and Texas suggest Democrats are within three seats of reclaiming a U.S. House majority after the midterms. New York, New Jersey, and Illinois are also considering redrawing Congressional maps to combat the Texas plan.

Newsom’s plan appears headed into a costly battle. Schwarzenegger and prominent Republican donor Charles Munger, Jr., both billionaires, are credited with the initiatives that took the mapping of district boundaries away from state legislators in 2008 for the California Legislature and in 2010 for the U.S. Congress.

A spokesman told Politico that Schwarzenegger is opposed to what Texas is doing, and “to the idea that California would race to the bottom to do the same thing.”

Munger last month created an X account that has put up just a single post, saying, “Any attempt to undermine the nonpartisan California Redistricting Commission will be strongly opposed in the courts and at the ballot box.”

Both Munger and Schwarzenegger see the independent commission as part of their legacy, said Thad Kousser, a UC San Diego political science professor who studies state and national politics.

“My guess is that they do fight it but there will be plenty of money on the other side,” Kousser said.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *